Tomorrow, we'll find out who gets to join last year's inductees Derek Jeter and Larry Walker in next summer's Hall of Fame festivities. I enjoy this time of
year, especially as voters reveal their ballots. I actually like reading
about these votes, and the thought process each writer makes in
choosing who they think is worthy. I wish more writers gave us a inside
look at their choices. It's fascinating.
Last year, I wrote about who I felt
deserved to get elected. I decided to do that again this year as well. Pardon me while I copy and paste from part of my
original post from 2018:
I obviously do not have an official vote, but I too have thought
about who is worthy and who would make my unofficial ballot. Before I
list my choices, a few clarifications into my voting process:
- I'm a "Big Hall" type of guy - I believe that the Hall's
main purpose is to reflect the history of the game. I'm not going to
cross a guy off just because he's not an inner circle type.
- As far as PED users go, I generally don't have a strong opinion.
Again, the Hall should reflect this era of the game. To be honest, I
have genuine reservations as to how much PED usage affects a player's
overall stats. That being said, those guys are placed in the back of the
line. As much as I may feel Manny Ramirez deserves to get in, if there are
at least 10 other worthy candidates, he won't make my ballot.
I'm going to categorize players into 3 groups - definitely
worthy, probably worthy, and maybe worthy. (Real scientific, I know...)
Definitely Worthy
These
are the guys I don't have to think hard about. They belong, and that's
all there is to it. Obviously, because of the PED issue, it's possible that not all of
these guys may make my final ballot.
Barry Bonds
Roger Clemens
Manny Ramirez
Curt Schilling
|
2007 Upper Deck Masterpieces #90 Curt Schilling |
You know the world is a crazy place when the one guy NOT associated with PEDs is the most controversial figure...
Probably Worthy
These players have strong cases, but not airtight. There are usually
some reservations. However, if they get elected, I won't have a problem
with it.
Todd Helton - There's a significant gap between his home/road splits. Should that matter? I haven't really decided.
Jeff Kent - Greatest power hitting 2nd baseman of all-time, at least until Cano becomes eligible.
Scott Rolen - Ive started coming around on him. He never struck me as a superstar, but his career shows that he might belong.
Gary Sheffield - He may not have been the most likable person, but he was a scary hitter at his peak.
Billy Wagner - He was dominant on the field (more so
than Trevor Hoffman), but pitching under 1,000 innings in his career is
a tough hurdle to jump.
|
1993 Score #534 Gary Sheffield (DT) |
Maybe Worthy
I'll be honest, I'm not convinced these guys belong. They have genuine cases though, and I'll have to put more thought into it.
Bobby Abreu
Mark Beuhrle
Tim Hudson
Torii Hunter
Andruw Jones
Andy Petite
Sammy Sosa
Omar Vizquel
Barry Zito
None of this year's first timers have a strong case. A part of me wants to bump Torii Hunter up a level, just because he was so fun to watch and was an amazing defender. Sosa and Petite were borderline candidates at best, and that was before the PED allegations. Abreu never struck me as a Hall of Fame player during his playing days, and seems to be a candidate just because he was consistent Andruw Jones built his entire case on the front end of his career, and if he didn't have such a mind-boggling drop-off we would be talking about a cartain all-time great. I'm going to just flat out say it - Omar Vizquel may be one of the great defensive shortstops in history, but he is not a Hall of Famer. It takes more just defense to make the Hall, and I'm not yet convinced that he belongs.
|
1997 Ultra - Gold Medallion #G153 Andruw Jones
|
My Ballot
Here's my unofficial 9 player ballot:
- Roger Clemens
- Barry Bonds
- Todd Helton
- Jeff Kent
- Manny Ramirez
- Scott Rolen
- Curt Schilling
- Gary Sheffield
- Billy Wagner
Bonds, Clemens, Ramirez, Sheffield, Petite and Sosa are held
back due to their PED connections. That leaves just Schilling
from the Definitely Worthy list and 4 guys from the Probably Worthy
list. Five spots remaining, but I only need 4 to add those remaining from my Definitely Worthy and Probably Worthy lists. For the first time since I started doing this, I'm not using up all 10 available spots.
In the end, I
expect Schilling will be the only one who has a reasonable shot. Lucky for him, his latest political controversy happened after most ballots were submitted. I do think it'd be funny if he, Clemens and Bonds squeak in this year, just because it'd provide an interesting contrast to have them inducted along-side Jeter and his untarnished image.
No matter how it shakes out, it'll be another fun and exciting Hall
class! (I'm just not looking forward to reading/hearing about how great
Jeter is all over again.)